Current Affairs

India’s Groundwater Crisis: When Cities Begin to Sink

Author: VisionIAS Editorial Team

Oct 31, 2025Current Affairs9 min read

India’s Groundwater Crisis: When Cities Begin to Sink

Groundwater extraction and the cumulative weight of urban structures are both contributing factors to subsidence in Indian megacities.

India’s Groundwater Crisis has reached an alarming tipping point. A recent study published in Nature Sustainability reveals that the land beneath five of the country’s largest cities is literally sinking, a phenomenon known as land subsidence primarily driven by excessive groundwater extraction.

With over 80 million residents and 13 million buildings at risk, this silent catastrophe demands urgent attention from policymakers, urban planners, and citizens alike.

Table of Contents

Understanding the Mechanics of Sinking Cities

Land subsidence occurs through a straightforward yet devastating geological process. When large volumes of groundwater are extracted from aquifers, particularly those composed of fine-grained sediments like silt and clay, the hydrostatic pressure that previously supported the sediment structure decreases. This pressure loss transfers the overlying load onto the solid sediment grains, causing them to compact permanently.

In Delhi, the primary driver is the compaction of alluvial deposits due to extensive groundwater extraction.
Chennai’s subsidence concentrates around the Adyar river floodplains, where sediments are particularly vulnerable.
Mumbai’s subsidence is notably higher in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods like Dharavi, where millions of unregulated borewells operate continuously.
Kolkata’s sinking relates to the compaction of sediments.
Bengaluru despite sitting on harder igneous and metamorphic rocks shows growing vulnerability as groundwater extraction intensified toward the end of 2022.

What makes this process particularly alarming is its irreversibility. Once fine-grained sediments compact, they cannot naturally expand back to their original structure. The damage to foundations, roads, pipelines, and buildings becomes a permanent legacy of poor water-management practices.

Roots of India’s Groundwater Crisis

India’s Groundwater Crisis stems from multiple interconnected factors, with agriculture consuming approximately 87% of the nation’s total groundwater extraction. States like Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan extract water at rates exceeding 100% of annual recharge, a practice driven largely by post-Green Revolution agricultural policies and heavily subsidized electricity for irrigation pumps.

While these subsidies were historically crucial for food security, they’ve created powerful economic incentives for continuous over-extraction. When pumping water costs almost nothing, farmers have little motivation to conserve, externalizing the true environmental cost onto aquifer systems and future generations.

Urban and industrial demands compound this agricultural pressure. In rapidly growing metropolitan areas, domestic and industrial water usage surges alongside population expansion. West Bengal, for instance, witnessed a 24% growth in domestic and industrial groundwater use over two decades, contributing to a 3% net reduction in annual groundwater availability.

Climate change acts as a threat multiplier. Projections suggest that climate-induced increases in irrigation withdrawal could triple groundwater depletion rates by 2080, creating a vicious feedback loop where increased drought frequency necessitates higher groundwater reliance, accelerating the depletion of the very resource needed for climate adaptation.

Cascading Consequences

Beyond the immediate structural risks to buildings, land subsidence intensifies existing urban hazards. Sinking land exacerbates flooding, a particularly dangerous combination in coastal cities like Chennai and Mumbai where sea-level rise compounds subsidence effects.

Earthquake vulnerability increases as ground settlement creates differential stresses on infrastructure. The public health dimension of India’s Groundwater Crisis extends beyond quantity to quality. Nearly 20% of groundwater samples nationwide exceed permissible pollutant limits, with 66 million people suffering from fluorosis making

India is the most severely affected country globally for fluoride contamination. Arsenic, nitrate, and salinity issues plague different regions, creating a scarcity-toxicity feedback loop where depleted aquifers concentrate remaining contaminants.

Economically, falling water tables impose regressive costs on users. Deeper extraction requires significantly more energy, forcing farmers to repeatedly invest in deepening wells while increasing operational expenses. This creates a race to the bottom, where individual actors bear increasing costs while collectively destroying the shared resource.

Governance Gap

Despite the severity of India’s Groundwater Crisis, effective regulation remains elusive due to a fundamental legal paradox. The colonial-era Indian Easements Act of 1882 grants landowners the right to extract unlimited groundwater beneath their property. Though Indian law doesn’t formally recognize private ownership of groundwater, this “natural right” has been interpreted as a de facto private entitlement, fundamentally obstructing aquifer-based regulation.

The Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA) monitors extraction rates and regulates abstraction through No-Objection Certificates for industries, but enforcement gaps persist. Gurugram, designated a “dark zone” by CGWA in 2008 due to severe over-extraction, exemplifies this failure of environmental activists note that the classification “changed nothing” as borewells continue operating unregulated.

Pathways to Sustainable Water-Management

Reversing India’s Groundwater Crisis requires coordinated action across multiple fronts, combining demand reduction, supply augmentation, and institutional reform.

Demand-Side Management: Financial incentives for conservation have proven remarkably effective. Punjab’s ‘Paani Bachao, Paisa Kamao’ (Save Water, Earn Money) scheme successfully links financial rewards to measurable conservation outcomes, offering a politically viable alternative to removing subsidies.
Supply-Side Augmentation: Artificial recharge through rainwater harvesting (RWH) is mandatory under the Model Building Bye Laws 2016, adopted by 35 States/UTs. Traditional methods like khadin systems, check dams, and percolation tanks combine with modern engineering solutions such as injection wells to replenish depleted aquifers.
Integrated Water-Management: The World Bank-supported Atal Bhujal Yojana represents the world’s largest community-led groundwater management program, implemented across 8,220 gram panchayats. This decentralized approach empowers local communities to monitor and budget water use based on locally collected data, supported by Hydrogeological Monitoring Networks providing the granular information essential for informed decision-making.

Learning from Global Success

Tokyo’s experience offers a powerful precedent. Facing severe subsidence in the mid-20th century, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government implemented strict regulations through the Industrial Water Law and Building Water Law, mandating cessation or reduction of groundwater extraction and requiring source substitution to industrial water supply services. The results were dramatic such as groundwater pumping dropped from 1.5 million m³/day in 1970 to 550,000 m³ by 2003, water tables recovered, and subsidence stabilized at approximately 1 cm per year in previously critical areas.

This demonstrates that political will, backed by comprehensive and enforced legislation recognizing groundwater as a common public resource rather than a private entitlement, can successfully reverse decades of hydrological and geotechnical damage.

Conclusion

India’s Groundwater Crisis and the resulting land subsidence represent more than environmental challenges, they constitute existential threats to urban infrastructure, public health, and economic stability. With 23,529 buildings projected to face very high structural damage risk within 50 years if current trends continue, the cost of inaction will be measured not just in economic terms but in human safety and livelihood security.

The path forward requires fundamental legal reform to detach groundwater rights from land ownership, scaling up proven conservation incentive programs, mandating source substitution in critical zones, and integrating advanced monitoring technologies with community-led water-management.